The OtterBox Venture is Yeti’s first real competitor that doesn’t just copy Yeti’s Tundra design. What follows are my thoughts on the pros and cons of each model, as they relate to pure usability, durability, and travel-friendliness. a long car-camping weekend in the mountains outside of Asheville, NC, for eclipse-watching (totality, baby!).a Memorial Day weekend bash on a lake in South Carolina and.a three-day canoeing trip down a river in western Virginia.I brought the Yeti Tundra 45 and the Otterbox Venture 45 on a summer’s worth of excursions: Of course, at the same $349.99 price point, both coolers are great values for people who need hardcore, tough coolers built to last. The bottom line: The OtterBox Venture seems like it’ll keep your ice colder for longer. Furthermore, the numbers really aren’t that far off, with only a 13% difference in leftover ice. But these results are what I came up with using my sixth-grade science class methodology, which pitted the coolers against each other in what should be their natural habitat: the side of the house on a summer afternoon. Could you debate all sorts of variables? Sure. Obligatory caveats: No, this wasn’t a truly scientific test, although I tried to make it as fair and accurate as possible. The winner: In a surprise usurping of the OG hard cooler, the OtterBox slightly outperformed the Yeti, with 5.75lbs of ice remaining vs.
I then weighed the remaining ice, to see which cooler managed to keep the water frozen for longer. Over the four days, the average high temperature in the area was 88°, and the average humidity was 78.5%, per the National Climatic Data Center.Īfter the test was over, I emptied each cooler of water, using a wire mesh colander to get as much water out as possible. Halfway through the test, I switched the coolers’ location so each had equal time in the same spot. I let the coolers sit for four days without opening the lids. The outside temperature at the start of the test was 79.9°. I latched each lid securely, and put both coolers in a shady spot on the side of the house, back on top of the bricks. They both were sitting at approximately 55°, per a Weber iGrill mini digital thermometer.Īcclimatization complete, I loaded 31.6lbs of ice into each cooler.
After the short cooldown, I reweighed the ice, sans plastic bags, and checked the internal temperature of each cooler. I then loaded up each cooler with two 16-lb bags of ice, and let them sit for 15 minutes. I set each cooler on two bricks to allow for air flow underneath. I set both coolers outside, next to each other, with the lids open. My method was simple: Load up each cooler with ice, let ’em sweat it out, and weigh the ice left over after days in the North Carolina heat.įirst, I let the coolers “acclimate” for three days to make sure they were starting on equal footing. I created a (mostly scientific) ice showdown in my backyard through an ultra-humid August in North Carolina. the tried-and-true veteran-in a battle of ice box supremacy. I was lucky enough to get testers of both products this summer, so naturally I did what any gear-minded guy would do: I pitted them against each other-brash newcomer vs. Otterbox’s newest Venture line, which came out in June, is injection-molded and designed to match (or exceed) the tough-cooler path blazed by Yeti’s signature Tundra products. (Yeti just won a lawsuit against a rival that closely mimicked their designs.) But the most recent competition for the adventure cooler king has come from noted device-case-and-drybox maker OtterBox. With sales numbers like that, other companies took notice and knock-offs flooded the market. Sales took off-the company as a whole hit more than $460 million in 2016-as outdoorsmen flocked to the pricey-but-tough coolers because they lasted season after season, and kept food and beer colder for longer. Then, in 2006, Yeti upended the cooler game, creating a burly but heavy ice chest made from roto-molded plastic, which allowed for one-piece construction with thicker walls for more insulation and robust corners to withstand rough outdoor action. All-plastic coolers were lighter, thicker, and cheaper, but also tended to often break in the field. (You can still buy them, albeit slightly updated.) But they didn’t keep your cold cuts cold for long, and they suffered from flimsy plastic pieces that often broke. Those steel-clad Colemans were plenty rugged and easily closed, which made them popular among outdoorsmen. Back in the old days-when plaid wool jackets were popular because they were made from scratchy wool, and not because urban lumbersexuals started wearing them-keeping your bratwursts and brews cold meant buying a Coleman cooler.
0 kommentar(er)
